<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Acceptance on Margrop Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.margrop.net/en/tag/acceptance/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Acceptance on Margrop Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.margrop.net/en/tag/acceptance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Models Change Every Week, But Nobody&#39;s Reviewing: Why Verifying AI Code Beats Picking the Right Model by 10x</title>
      <link>https://blog.margrop.net/en/post/ai-code-review-bottleneck-acceptance-over-model/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.margrop.net/en/post/ai-code-review-bottleneck-acceptance-over-model/</guid>
      <description>TL;DR&#xA;Over the past two years I&amp;rsquo;ve used nearly every Coding Agent out there: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenClaw&amp;hellip; the models rotate and the leaderboards refresh daily. But I&amp;rsquo;ve grown convinced of one thing: what determines whether you succeed with AI isn&amp;rsquo;t which model you pick — it&amp;rsquo;s whether you have a real skill for verifying the code AI writes. The model generates the code; verification decides whether it ships.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
