<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Javascript on Margrop Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.margrop.net/en/tag/javascript/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Javascript on Margrop Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:25:23 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.margrop.net/en/tag/javascript/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Feign usage examples: @Body annotation, http request body</title>
      <link>https://blog.margrop.net/en/post/feign-demo/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:25:23 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.margrop.net/en/post/feign-demo/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a situation where the interface uses the http request body to pass parameters, so I studied feign and found that the @Body annotation can generally be implemented.&#xA;Although it is said that the request body is used to pass parameters, in fact, the request body still contains data in json format. Of course, if you don&amp;rsquo;t want to be limited to the json format, you can set it to a universal format. See the end of the article for details.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Three JavaScript Quirks Java/C Developers Should Know</title>
      <link>https://blog.margrop.net/en/post/three-javascript-quirks-java-c-developers-should-know/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2021 22:28:36 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.margrop.net/en/post/three-javascript-quirks-java-c-developers-should-know/</guid>
      <description>JavaScript can be a deceptive language and can cause a lot of pain because it&amp;rsquo;s not 100% consistent. It is known that it does have some bad, confusing or redundant features: the infamous with statement, 隐式全局变量 and 不稳定的比较 are probably the most famous.&#xA;JavaScript is one of the most successful flame generators in history! Aside from its flaws (which are partially addressed in the new ECMAScript specification), most programmers hate JavaScript for two reasons:</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
